ALARM! :: I should have told you that movies in the afternoon are my weakness.

"Nobody should be a mystery intentionally. Unintentionally is mysterious enough."

Friday, July 22, 2005

Reverse Shot hits its mark

One of the consumate Armond White haters over at Reverse Shot takes on the Village Voice this week, ladling on a 1000 calorie serving of snark:

I don't want to go on too much about Dennis Lim's panting over Gus Vant Sant's new floater Last Days or Michael Atkinson's overthinking of 9 Songs' lifeless provocation, other than to say that write-ups like this only facilitate the production of anemic, fatuously "difficult" arthouse fare and allow idea-barren twat directors to coast on moddish minimalism, confident that there will always be plenty of dithery, quasi-intellectual writers to fill in their blanks with genius. Sure, Van Sant's new movies "waft," but so do dog farts.

This week's real prize winner, however: In the time-honored tradition of scraping the bottom of the rolodex for 15th tier critics when it comes time to review less-than-prestigious horror titles, we get "Benjamin Strong" waxing retarded on Devil's Rejects. First sentence: "If in retrospect musician Rob Zombie's 2003 directorial debut, House of 1,000 Corpses , reads like a yee-hawing harbinger of last fall's red-state triumph, then its sequel, The Devil's Rejects , is the smug Republican victory lap." "If in retrospect"... But it doesn't. At all. Nice blind stab at "relevance" Ben; looking forward to hearing you place 'Dukes of Hazzard' in a "in the wake of 9/11" context. Jackass.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home