Notes on a Critic
I am completely obsessed with critics’ notes. Maybe this is because of how important mine are to me. I tend to remember my general impressions of a movie fairly well, but I’m terrible remember the specifics—the exact order of certain scenes, the particulars of how a shot is set up, visual or auditory cues of particular note, and, most importantly, specific dialog. So my notes, which are about 50% transcriptions of dialog and 50% observations--my brain struggling to process the film in real time--are incredibly important. They're like an incredibly low-level recreation of, if not the film itself, my individual experience of it.
I know there are critics who don’t take notes and still manage to write convincing criticism. I’ve done it, and I used to do it regularly in college, but it’s a scary thing, and I tend toward broad generalizations for fear of getting specifics wrong. I’m too scattered, too busy, too mixed up in too many diverting projects and ancillary thoughts to mentally hold onto the information in a really comprehensive manner.
One of the things, though, that always interests me is when critics refer to their notes in their reviews or other writing. David Edelstein does this sometimes, and I seem to recall Dana Stevens doing it as well. It’s sort of a weird thing to do: Isn’t the job of the professional writer not just to transcribe those notes, but to take them and process them into something slick and professional? Except at the same time, it’s also interesting: It tells you not just about the movie, but about the critic, the person reviewing the film and how they think.
Anyway, it just strikes me that someone ought to do some sort of museum project on critics’ notes: a blown up collection of notes from noted critics or notes that led to famous reviews. Or, even better, some professional critic should scan their notes and publish them online alongside their reviews. How cool would that be?
Addendum: On the other hand, as Terry Teachout implies, notes are a symbol that something is being viewed for work, not just pleasure. Of course it's not quite that simple either. These days, when I go to movies just for fun, or when I watch DVDs at home that aren't related to anything I'm working on, it feels like something of a relief, and yet I also get the urge to start scribbling. How else will I remember? For a regular note-taker, seeing a movie without notes is to be reminded that casual viewing is both more relaxing, and even more involving--yet doesn't lend itself as easily to the thorough consideration that a note-taker might be used to.
6 Comments:
That's an interesting idea. You should start a meme in the blogosphere for facsimile critic notes, just for the laugh. I'm not sure I'd be proud to show my notes... If I could just scan & post, I would review more films than I do at my current pace. But I'm afraid they are only meaningful to me, coded in keywords that I would explain at the writing stage.
I don't take notes for every viewing, but when I do I try to lay down the continuity scene by scene right after the film. It does help to recall all other details afterward.
Here's an interesting idea:
For those of us who take them, our notes actually define the way we approach films. I can't read my own handwriting, and I'm too impatient and too old to reform. I took notes for many years, but then I began to realize that I never referred back to them because they were illegibile.
But I favor a close-reading, formalistic analysis kind of film criticism, so notes are indispensible. The solution: I find now that I'm nearly unwilling to really review a film I've only seen once (though I'll make the effort, I'll work, if I'm being paid).
My notes have influenced my entire approach to film writing...
I too am generally fascinated by critics' references to their notes, and I've been meaning to write about this for some time now. But I'm going to take a different approach: I almost inevitably find myself cringing at the way notes are referenced. More on that later...
Oh, and I can't find a reference to notes in the Teachout post you're linking to. It could be that I'm not scrolling down far enough... ?
Sorry -- he doesn't actually use the word notes. He says:
"This time around I came to Raleigh not as a critic but as a civilian, more than happy to simply sit in my seat and watch Weiss and Taylor-Corbett do their stuff."
I took that to mean he's just watching, not worrying, analyzing, note-taking, all the usual critic habits that the notebook and pen represent.
Check. I concur with your interpretation.
I stopped taking notes. Mine were either illegible or stupid.
One of my favorite "notes" moments came in a Roger Ebert review, where he described his notes as starting out with what you might expect - names of characters, scenario, etc. - and then descending into a shopping list.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home