ALARM! :: I should have told you that movies in the afternoon are my weakness.

"Nobody should be a mystery intentionally. Unintentionally is mysterious enough."

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Some Movies I Haven't Seen, and a Few I Have

I haven't been keeping up with my theatrical viewing recently. I saw Breach, which I'll probably write about next month. If you liked Shattered Glass, well, then you'll like this--maybe even better. Billy Ray has gone and made the D.C. movie of the year . . . again. I'll have a review of Smokin' Aces up on Friday (ace isn't the first word I'd use to describe it). And I saw the D.C. premiere of Mine Your Own Business, a very fine documentary about NGOs and the mining industry, tonight (full disclosure: my current employer helped co-sponsor the screening). But somehow I've still not managed to see Volver, The Last King of Scotland, Pan's Labyrinth, or Letters from Iwo Jima--a rather unacceptable situation that I hope to soon remedy.

I did manage to catch The Fan, Tony Scott's mid 90s De Niro-sports-stalker pic, on DVD. I can't say it was one of the director's better films. It might best be described as flash, splash, and rehash – or better yet, just trash. Scott's direction is vivid, glossy, and dashing as always, like an AT&T commercial on steroids, and De Niro turns what should've been a nothing role into something almost compelling. But he's just replaying better parts (Pupkin, Bickle), and Scott's direction can't even manage the bloated, overwrought guilty pleasure of something like Last Boyscout. Surprisingly, Snipes is the best thing here, a conflicted, but ultimately decent, guy. It's not high art, or maybe even art in any sense, but it's an honest performance.

Labels:

3 Comments:

Blogger D. B. Light said...

I just saw Pan's Labyrinth. Visually impressive, but not very coherent. The interleaving stories just don't match, stylistically, thematically, or narratively. There's not even a dialectical relationship, just two stories.

The critics miss one fundamental fact about the film. It doesn't move back and forth between fantasy and the real world, simply between two realms of fantasy, one based in childhood, the other in Marxist legend.

I'm still waiting for Del Toro to reach his considerable potential, but he's going to have to grow up a lot first.

Like you I am way, way behind on my film watching [I just recently saw "Munich" for the first time -- it gains resonance from having also seen "Army of Shadows" recently] and plan to catch up.

I look forward to your comments, especially on Volver and King which I will be seeing next week.

Enjoy, enjoy.

January 25, 2007 3:23 AM  
Blogger Peter said...

D.B. -- The Munch/Shadows connection is really perfect. Somehow that'd totally escaped me, and yet, looking back it's so obvious I don't see how I could've missed it.

Interesting thoughts on Del Toro. I'm a pretty big fan. At times, you'll find me claiming that Hellboy is actually the best comic movie, and if you catch me at a really odd time, on you might even catch me arguing that Blade II isn't just a fun movie, but an actual good one. I know -- I'm a sucker for thoughtful trash. Interested to see how PL stacks up.

January 25, 2007 8:31 AM  
Blogger D. B. Light said...

Peter,

I agree with you regarding Blade II, especially the first half of the film. He's really taking us into new territory there. The last half hour, though, sucks.

Hellboy is a well-realized comic book movie, but that's not setting the bar very high. Perelman is terrific in both films, but then he usually turns in a good performance. Selma Blair is hot. I particularly like the line "you should be running now." Like most comic book films, there are a few striking scenes that will stick with me, but you have to wade through a lot of adolescent nonsense to get to them.

I guess what I'm saying is that thoughtful and visually impressive trash is still trash -- not that there's anything wrong with that.

January 26, 2007 1:24 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home